Detroit’s City Council last meeting of the year came to a head as leaders wrestled with the weight of responsibility tied to federal disaster recovery funds. This was not just about dollars and cents—it was about priorities, about the kind of city Detroit wants to rebuild. With $95 million in federal aid allocated to address the aftermath of catastrophic flooding in 2021, the council was tasked with a decision that underscored the tension between immediate relief and long-term resilience.
The flooding that hit Detroit three years ago left its mark not only on thousands of homes but on the psyche of residents who are still recovering. This meeting reflected a broader question: how to make meaningful use of resources in a way that directly benefits those still grappling with the impact of the disaster.
A 6-3 vote sealed the decision to allocate $47.6 million of the recovery funds toward repairing homeless shelters, addressing collapsed city sewer drains, and constructing affordable rental housing. While this decision passed, it did not go without criticism. Council Members Latisha Johnson, Gabriela Santiago-Romero, and Angela Whitfield-Calloway stood firm in opposition. Their concern? The funds should prioritize Detroit’s basement backup protection program, which aims to prevent flooding in residential basements, a recurring issue in vulnerable neighborhoods.
Latisha Johnson’s comments reflected the heart of the debate. “I see a tremendous need to help residents become more resilient in their home,” she said. For her, the federal disaster funds were intended to directly address the damage caused by the floods and prepare residents for future storms. Johnson raised strong objections to the decision to allocate $17 million toward single-family rental housing, even if it targets areas most affected by the 2021 flooding. To her, this felt like a missed opportunity to ensure families living in flood-prone areas would not have to endure similar hardships again.
The basement backup protection program, designed to fortify homes in 11 neighborhoods prone to flooding, has been a critical resource for residents. A second phase of the program began earlier this year, but the city is no longer accepting new applications. This leaves many Detroiters—particularly those in districts hit hardest by flooding—feeling like their needs are being overlooked. Johnson’s stance emphasized this gap, arguing that prioritizing the program could offer immediate, tangible benefits to those most affected.
Council Member Coleman Young II, however, took a pragmatic approach to the situation. While recognizing the frustrations tied to unmet needs, Young emphasized the urgency of utilizing the $95 million before the opportunity slipped away entirely. “A couple of rules of the road: Don’t scratch a man’s car, don’t take food off another man’s plate without asking and you do not look a gift horse of $95 million in the mouth,” he said. For Young, the risk of losing access to the funds altogether outweighed the potential benefits of a drawn-out process to redirect spending.
Julie Schneider, who serves as director of the Housing and Revitalization Department, added a layer of complexity to the discussion. She explained the challenges tied to shifting the spending plan, particularly given the uncertain political climate. The incoming Republican-majority Congress, Schneider warned, might not be willing to reallocate emergency funding for past disasters. Redirecting funds now could result in months of public engagement and compliance work with no guarantee of success. Schneider suggested the possibility of using leftover pandemic relief dollars to bolster the basement backup program, though this solution remains far from certain.
Detroit has already committed $43 million of federal flood aid to expand its private sewer repair program. What began in 22 neighborhoods will eventually reach 99. The program has made headway: since August, 309 sewer repairs have been completed, addressing some of the immediate infrastructure issues caused by the 2021 flooding. However, the demand far outweighs the resources. As of now, the city has received 1,676 applications from homeowners, most of whom are eager for relief from the ongoing effects of flood damage.
Council Member Gabriela Santiago-Romero, representing District 6, voiced concerns about the barriers residents face when trying to access the sewer repair program. She pointed to the cumbersome application process, which requires 13 pieces of documentation—a significant hurdle for many Detroiters who are already navigating the challenges of flood recovery. Santiago-Romero’s critique highlighted an issue that extends beyond funding allocation: how bureaucracy can inadvertently exclude those most in need.
The debate also exposed a deeper divide over the role of government in disaster recovery. For Johnson, Santiago-Romero, and Whitfield-Calloway, the focus should be on empowering residents to build resilience within their homes. This perspective reflects a belief that disaster recovery funds should not only address immediate needs but also equip communities to withstand future crises. On the other hand, proponents of the current spending plan argue that investments in infrastructure and housing are just as vital to long-term recovery.
Affordable housing, one of the key elements of the council’s plan, remains a pressing issue in Detroit. While the city has made strides in expanding access to housing, many residents are still struggling to find stable, affordable options. The decision to allocate $17 million toward single-family rental housing in flood-affected areas is seen by some as a necessary step toward addressing this gap. For others, however, this allocation feels disconnected from the immediate needs of families still living with the effects of the 2021 floods.
As the council meeting drew to a close, the tension in the room was evident. This was not just a debate over dollars; it was a reflection of the city’s values and priorities. For residents watching the decision unfold, the stakes were clear: these funds represent an opportunity to make meaningful progress, but the path forward is fraught with challenges.
Detroiters have seen what happens when government fails to act decisively in the face of disaster. The 2021 floods were a painful reminder of the city’s vulnerabilities, particularly for Black and low-income residents who bore the brunt of the damage. The allocation of these federal funds is an opportunity to address some of those vulnerabilities, but it’s also a test of the city’s commitment to equity and inclusion.
This debate is far from over. While the council’s decision provides a roadmap for how the funds will be spent, the implementation process will be critical. Residents will be watching closely to see if these investments lead to meaningful change in their communities—or if the funds simply disappear into the bureaucracy.
For now, Detroit’s leaders must grapple with the weight of their choices. As Johnson aptly stated, “These dollars were sent to the city for disaster recovery.” Whether the council’s plan ultimately fulfills that promise remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that Detroiters will continue to hold their leaders accountable, demanding solutions that reflect their needs and priorities.
About Post Author
