Unmasking Racism in Michigan’s Halls of Power, Gov. Whitmer, Lt. Gov. Gilchrist Statements on Rep. Schriver’s Racist Social Media Posts

Here in an era where the echoes of our ancestors’ struggles for justice and equality still resound, the recent actions of State Representative Josh Schriver from Oxford serve as a stark reminder that the battle against the insidious forces of racism and white supremacy is far from over. House Speaker Joe Tate of Detroit has taken decisive measures against racism, stripping Representative Schriver of his legislative staff and removing him from the influential House Natural Resources, Environment, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation Committee. This action, taken in response to Schriver’s spread of a deeply offensive and racially charged conspiracy theory, underscores a strong stance against intolerance and a deep-seated commitment to uphold the principles of justice and equality within the legislative community.

The incident in question unfolded last week when Schriver, aligning himself with the pernicious ideologies of the far right, shared a post from commentator Jack Posobiec on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. The content was a graphic, crudely dividing the world with “The great replacement!” emblazoned across it, depicting white figures in majority-white countries and black figures elsewhere. This act of sharing not only amplified a dangerous and debunked conspiracy theory but also betrayed a glaring disregard for the humanity and dignity of people of color. The ‘great replacement’ theory, as identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center, is nothing short of a racist and paranoid narrative, a covert effort to replace white populations in majority-white countries with non-white individuals, a narrative steeped in paranoia and bigotry.

The response to Schriver’s post was swift and widespread, transcending party lines and reaffirming our shared values as a society that aspires to justice and equality. Governor Gretchen Whitmer, in her condemnation, articulated the collective outrage, stating, “The abhorrent rhetoric pushed by a member of the Michigan House of Representatives goes against our state and national values. We have a moral obligation to speak out against hatred.” This statement is a clarion call for leadership to rise against such hatred, emphasizing that silence and inaction in the face of racism only serve to embolden the oppressors.

Echoing the governor’s sentiments, Lieutenant Governor Garlin Gilchrist II, alongside other Democratic lawmakers, stood in solidarity against the perpetuation of hate. “Racism is dark, dangerous, and disgraceful. Rep. Schriver’s pedaling of the racist ‘replacement theory’ is a deplorable demonstration of his fear of a dynamic and diverse Michigan future where all of our people in every community can succeed. What is equally as abhorrent is the fact that this rhetoric has not been condemned in any serious way by Rep. Schriver’s Republican Party counterparts. The silence is deafening,” said Gilchrist. “Our responsibility is to ensure that this darkness will not win. The vision Governor Whitmer and I have for Michigan, a vision that the vast majority of Michiganders share, is a welcoming, strong state where everyone can thrive. We will continue our work to ensure every single person—no matter who they are —feel welcomed, empowered, and respected in Michigan.”

Even voices from within Schriver’s own party, such as Republican state Senator John Damoose and State Representative Donni Steele, have publicly denounced his actions. Damoose, in a poignant reflection, remarked, “I read with great horror yesterday a report of a Michigan state legislator advancing overtly cruel and racist ideas…his sickening words have nothing to do with the ideals we claim to uphold as Americans or conservatives.”

In defending the indefensible, Schriver has continued to stand by his post, a stance that not only reveals a disheartening lack of remorse but also underscores the pervasive challenge of racism that continues to plague our society. This incident is a grim reminder of the potent and destructive power of hate, as evidenced by the tragic mass shooting in Buffalo in 2022, where a gunman, motivated by the same racist conspiracy, claimed the lives of ten Black individuals.

Speaker Tate, in his unwavering resolve to uphold the principles of justice and equality, articulated the imperative of maintaining the integrity and inclusivity of the House of Representatives. “I will not allow the Michigan House of Representatives to be a forum for the proliferation of racist, hateful, and bigoted speech,” Tate asserted, a declaration that echoes the enduring call for freedom and justice that has defined the struggles of Black people and all oppressed communities throughout history.

The recent disciplinary actions against Representative Schriver for spreading racist theories bring to the forefront troubling questions about the inner workings of Michigan’s political system and the safeguards against bigotry within it. House Speaker Joe Tate’s firm stance is commendable, yet it begs a deeper inquiry: How did an individual with such views manage to navigate through the electoral process and secure a seat of influence? This incident not only strips Schriver of his team and resources but also lays bare a harsh reality—the persistence of racial prejudice within the corridors of justice. It forces a reckoning with the uncomfortable truth that the door to racism in our justice system remains ajar.

Reflecting on this, one must ponder the efficacy of mere condemnations in the face of such deep-seated issues. Just last year, Michigan celebrated the appointment of its first Black justice to the Supreme Court, a landmark moment 185 years in the making. Yet, incidents like these expose the undercurrents of hidden racism that, when surfaced, seem to catch the community off guard. In this era, as Michigan grapples with its stance on racial equality and justice, the challenge extends beyond identifying racism to actively rooting it out. The question remains: In the fight against racism that slips through the cracks, are words of condemnation enough, or is a more profound systemic overhaul required?

Let’s face the truth: Schriver’s actions were a clear division between white and black communities, revealing a stark reality that cannot be ignored. This isn’t just about spreading harmful ideologies; it’s a direct reflection of an underlying disdain for Black people. While condemning racism in any form is valuable, it’s crucial to zero in on the specific issue at hand: this was an act of segregation aimed squarely at the Black community. Considering that Michigan is home to Detroit, the city with the highest Black population in the United States, the implications of Schriver’s actions cannot be understated. This was not just a broad act of racism; it could be seen as a targeted attack on Black individuals, a reality that we know all too well. Acknowledging this undeniable truth is the first step towards addressing the problem and moving forward. Or, is moving forward even possible? 

This incident not only reflects the ongoing struggle against racism and extremism within our political institutions but also highlights the critical need for leadership that upholds the values of equality, justice, and unity.

About Post Author

From the Web

X
Skip to content