In the wake of persistent societal calls for equity and anti-discrimination, a recent event in Mont Belvieu, Texas, flares tensions and reignites the dialogue about structural bias, particularly regarding race and expression. Darryl George, an 18-year-old junior at Barbers Hill High School, faces punitive action over his hairstyle, as reported by the Associated Press. His dreadlocks, a poignant symbol of cultural identity and personal expression, seemingly clash with the school’s stringent hair policy.
Barbers Hill Independent School District (BHISD) mandates that male students’ hair must not extend below the eyebrows, ear lobes, or top of a T-shirt collar. The handbook further specifies that all students must maintain clean, well-groomed, geometrically consistent, and naturally colored hair. The school, notably, does not enforce a uniform policy.
Principal Lance Murphy substantiates the disciplinary actions against George, stating in a letter, “George has repeatedly violated the district’s previously communicated standards of student conduct.” Beginning October 12th, George faces a removal from his current educational setting to be placed in EPIC, an alternative school program, through November 29th, for “failure to comply” with various regulations.
Yet, the George family and their legal representatives contest that the teen’s hairstyle adheres to the outlined dress code. A formal complaint has been submitted to the Texas Education Agency, and a federal civil rights lawsuit is active against the state’s governor and attorney general. The family alleges that the punitive actions notably conflict with the state’s CROWN Act, which actively sought to obliterate discrimination based on hairstyles from September 1st.
“Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair” – the CROWN Act, serves to bar employers and educational institutions from penalizing individuals due to hair texture or protective hairstyles, such as dreadlocks, Afros, braids, twists, or Bantu knots. Although a federal version of this law navigated successfully through the U.S. House, it fell short in the Senate.
Now, the critical question emerges: Is BHISD sidestepping the CROWN Act? Despite previous legal altercations, with cousins De’Andre Arnold and Kaden Bradford in 2020 regarding similar hair policy conflicts, which subsequently resulted in a federal judge deeming the district’s hair policy discriminatory, the district persists.
It prompts a collective reflection and call to action. How does society confront and dismantle systemic prejudices embedded in educational environments? Can an effective, unified effort break down these divisive walls, ensuring equal respect and consideration for all students, regardless of race, ethnicity, or personal expression?
While the school district seeks clarification on whether its dress code policies infringe upon the CROWN Act, the atmosphere grows palpably tense. The pending litigation from Arnold and Bradford’s family is emblematic of a community grappling with antiquated, discriminatory norms and the pursuit of genuine equality and respect for individual and cultural expression.
A challenge for policymakers, educators, parents, and society emerges – how can the evolution toward genuine equality be accelerated, ensuring every student’s rights, dignity, and expressions are upheld and respected?
About Post Author
